In a recent Chronicle of Philanthropy Article, Paul Schmitz of Public Allies says, “We’ve become too focused on strong programs being the solution, rather than strong communities. We have to think differently if we want results.
I’ve been doing a lot of thinking about change, innovation and relationships this year. I’ve had the opportunity to learn about models, such as the STRIVE model, which uses four pillars – shared community vision, evidence-based decision making, collaborative action and investment and sustainability – to promote change across institutions and systems specifically for kids. Another model is the CDC, which uses national networks to disseminate successful change practices nationally. In the months ahead, I’ll be exploring what these models have in common and how they differ.
I’m very fortunate to have some close friends to guide me as I learn, including my friends at the Suburban Ramsey Family Collaborative (SRFC). This coalition of schools, providers, interested businesses community organizations and families really models the emphasis on strong communities. While the STRIVE model notes the importance of selecting a few key indicators to focus on in order to make a difference, SRFC opens up a discussion with its partners annually, reviewing data and determining where additional support and resources are needed—as well as celebrating successes. The broader model has been flexible and responsive as local communities change, becoming more economically and ethnically diverse.
Perhaps a hybrid of these approaches is necessary for really big changes – blending focus on a few important issues with responsiveness to a community and reliance on partners to disseminate information.
How about you – where have you seen really big changes take place? Who made the change happen, and how?
